Dic 05

Curso Ingeniería de Refractarios Anfre

Del 20 al 24 de noviembre tuvo lugar en Bilbao la primera edición del Curso de Ingeniería de Refractarios Anfre, es el primer curso impartido íntegramente por asociados de ANFRE. Esta primera edición del curso ha contado con alumnos pertenecientes a empresas asociadas a Anfre, ya que desde Anfre queríamos que fueran ellos los primeros en poder beneficiarse de este curso. El resultado total ha sido un gran éxito, tanto de aforo como de acogida del curso.

Es un curso en el que se ha combinado a la perfección las clases teóricas y las visitas a distintas empresas de interés para el sector, dichas visitas han servido para dar una visión más real del mundo del refractario, se han visitado las siguientes empresas:

  • Sidenor
  • Azterlan
  • Krosaki – AMR Refractarios.


Agradecer enormemente a las tres empresas el tiempo que  nos han dedicado y recordarles que pueden contar con nosotros siempre que  nos necesiten.

Los temas  que se han tratado han sido los siguientes:

  • Materiales refractarios
  • Introducción al Diseño de Revestimientos
  • Aplicación de Refractarios
  • Secado, calentamiento y enfriamiento
  • Seguridad y Control de Calidad.

Todos estos temas han sido preparados y presentados por empresas asociadas de ANFRE.

Desde Anfre  queremos dar las gracias una vez más a las siguientes empresas, sin ellas el curso no hubiera sido posible:

  • Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio
  • Insertec
  • Arciresa
  • Morgan Advanced Materials
  • Deguisa
  • Dominion Global S.A
  • Teide Refractory Solutions
  • Calderys Ibérica Refractarios S.A
  • Técnicas de Refractarios S.A.U
  • Reyma, Materiales Refractarios
  • Gerfor S.A
  • Refractarios Alfran S.A
  • Prevencoor

Por último desde Anfre queremos hacer una mención especial a Dolores Cagigas, Javier Trujillano y Roberto Caballero, creadores y artífices de este curso. Sin ellos el resultado no hubiera sido el mismo.

Igualmente agradecer la disponibilidad absoluta de nuestro Presidente, Carlos Briz Iceta.

Nos vemos en el siguiente curso!!!

Nov 28

Global Refractories: Facing the next production revolution

One of the largest markets for industrial minerals, refractories are essential for producing steel, glass, ceramics, cement and lime and for many other processes requiring high temperatures. But as Richard Flook* explains, despite their crucial role, manufacturers of these products are facing significant challenges from changing global trends.

The refractories industry is estimated to currently consume about 40m tpa of industrial minerals and has more than doubled in size in the decade between 2000 and 2010, mainly due to rapid industrialisation in China.

Major markets for refractories are the production of steel, cement and glass and the processing of minerals. The steel, cement and lime industries are estimated to account for about 85% of the total refractory market.

Construction markets therefore drive about 50% of overall refractory demand and automotive and other transport markets account for another 15%.

In 2016, The World Economic Form envisaged the next industrial revolution and the «emergence of technologies that have the power to drive a whole new cycle of global economic activity». More recently, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) talked about the next production revolution, which «will occur because of a confluence of technologies» and will involve new materials and new processes and will transform production.

Emerging technologies include smart factories and automation, robotics, 3D printing and contour crafting and driverless and electric vehicles (EVs).


Electric growth
Environmental concerns and advances in technology are driving a shift in the global energy mix. In its Energy Outlook 2017, major oil producer BP forecast that thermal coal consumption will peak in the 2020s. Oil and gas, together with coal, are expected to remain the main sources of energy, accounting for more than 75% of total energy supply, in 2035, but this will be down significantly from their 86% market share in 2015.

Meanwhile, renewables are projected to be the fastest-growing fuel sources over the same period, expanding at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.6%.

Data collected by Bloomberg suggest that solar and wind will dominate new electricity installations and account for nearly 50% of installed capacity by 2040. Many large corporations are actively promoting decarbonisation and renewable energy targets.

For example, Dutch paints company AkzoNobel NV is attempting to be carbon neutral and use 100% renewable energy by 2050, while US brewing firm Anheuser-Busch is aiming to purchase 100% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2025.

BP estimate that electric car sales will increase from 1.2m in 2015 to around 100m in 2035 (around 5% of the global car fleet), representing a CAGR of 25%. India is aiming for sales of all new vehicles to be electric after 2030, France has announced that petrol and diesel new car sales will be banned after 2040 and the UK has said that all new car sales must be for electric models after the same date.

Other forecasters expect that by 2030, the cost to store energy in batteries will reach parity with the internal combustion engine, which will deliver a huge boost to EV sales.

Implications for refractories
The growth of large scale renewable energy projects will require significant quantities of durable, corrosion-resistant coated steel. However, growth in the market for steel in automobiles is expected to slow, due to the requirement for lighter and stronger components. Advanced high-strength steel alloys are also expected to face increasing competition from plastic composites and lightweight metals, such as aluminium.

South Korean steelmaker POSCO has estimated that the steel intensity of a many steel-consuming industries will substantially decrease in the next 20 years (see Table 1). In particular, the company estimates that the steel intensity of the automobile industry will decline by 20%, while that of the construction industry will decline by about 16%.

In the long run, global GDP is a good indicator for both steel and cement demand, with a 97% correlation between 2000 and 2016 (see Figure 1).

Global economic growth has slowed in the last decade and macro political risks are increasing. In the absence of global shocks, global GDP is expected to be 2-4% on a purchasing power parity (PPP) measure in the short term, with higher growth in Asia.

China, India and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) are expected to remain relatively high growth regions with GDP expansion of 5-7% and are expected to account for 60% of global growth. By 2050, Indonesia is expected to join China and India as one of the world’s largest economies, with Vietnam and the Philippines making the greatest gains in global ranking.

In the short term, China remains the major global economic driver, although the recent downgrade of China’s sovereign credit rating on debt concerns has raised questions over its future growth prospects. At China’s 12th National People’s Congress in March 2017, the GDP growth target for 2017 was set at 6.5%.

Reducing pollution and moving industry from low-value to high-value manufacturing have become short-to-medium term priorities. These trends have already adversely impacted demand for refractories, as well as the supply of certain refractory raw materials in China.

Production of steel, cement and flat glass in China, the dominant global producer of these materials, has been relatively stagnant for a few years (see Figure 2).

Refractory raw materials and China
China provides the majority of the raw materials used for its own refractory production and for about a quarter of the raw materials needed for refractory production outside China. In particular China is a global leader in the supply of refractory bauxite, brown fused alumina (BFA), fused magnesia (FM) and dead burned magnesia (DBM).
It is no wonder that recent events in China are causing some concern with refractory producers relying on raw materials from China.

China is estimated to produce about 69% of the world’s magnesite and 63% of the world’s magnesia and supply 44% of the world’s magnesia exports.

Earlier in 2017 pollution inspection teams were said to have effected output in about 95% of magnesia producers in Liaoning province. Production was reduced and prices increased.

Combined production of Chinese DBM and FM was down about 55% y-o-y in June 2017 and nearly 30% for the first half of 2017. Refractory production in China was also down about 15% in the first six months of 2017. In the same period, prices of FM and DBM rose at a rate of around 90%, according to the IM Pricing Database. For both DBM and FM the highest increases were for higher purity products.

More recently, it has been reported that consolidation of the magnesia industry is planned in Liaoning with almost 80% of national production to be controlled by China Magnesite Mining Co. which will be 51% owned by Haicheng Magnesite Factory.

In Shanxi province similar environmental inspections and restrictions have affected the supply and prices of refractory grade bauxite and fused alumina. Prices of calcined bauxite have increased by about 25% in 2017 according to IM Pricing Database. Graphite electrodes which are used in fused mineral production are also in tight supply and have experienced large price increases of over 300% which is adversely affecting Chinese and global fused mineral production.

In a separate development it has been reported that 73 Chinese titanium dioxide (TiO2) feedstock plants are being permanently closed by the government due to failure to meet anti pollution requirements.

There is no expectation that the supply of Chinese raw materials will improve at least in the short term. There are now strong indications that the long term outlook is no better. China has been the world’s biggest commodity manufacturer since 2010 but the «Made in China 2015» programme calls for China to be more self-sufficient in advanced manufacturing and the dominant global producer by 2049. If successful, this will reduce the economic requirement for Chinese production of commodity products such as steel and cement and will reduce the domestic demand for refractory raw materials. Combined with stricter environmental controls, it is not hard to see continuing increases in the costs of Chinese refractory raw materials.

It would appear that export of industrial minerals from China will be more difficult in the future and the age of cheap Chinese raw materials is or will be now over. Development of non-Chinese industrial mineral raw materials will become more important and a necessary strategy for non-Chinese customers of refractory and industrial minerals.

Steel outlook
The World Steel Association (worldsteel) is predicting 1.3% growth in global steel production in 2017 and 0.9% in 2018. Growth outside China is expected to be higher, at 2.4% in 2017 and 3.1% in 2018.

However, these projections are currently looking too modest. In the first six months of 2017, world crude steel production was 836m tonnes, an increase of 4.5% compared to the same period in 2016. Global steel production would have to be 3.1% lower in the second half of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 to match worldsteel’s projection of a 1.3% increase this year.

POSCO has made longer-term projections of global steel, demand based on four main considerations: slowing consumption growth, in line with decreasing steel intensity (see Table 1); a need for more advanced steel products; steelmakers upgrading to eco-friendly and smart steel making processes; and moves to create value using the Internet of Things (IoT), big data and artificial intelligence.

Taking account of these trends, POSCO forecasts that global steel demand will grow at a CAGR of 1.2% between 2016 and 2025 and at a CAGR of 0.9% between 2025 and 2035.

These projections are broadly in agreement with the latest estimates from the Australian Chief Economist, which point to global steel production and demand growth of about 1.1% between 2016 and 2019 (see Table 2).
The Australian government expects steel production in China to fall and settle below 800m tpa, while demand is forecast to remain below 700m tpa and progressively decline. The growing number of trade restrictions, including tighter US protectionist measures, may further restrict Chinese steel exports and production.

Industry bodies the China Iron and Steel Association and the China Metallurgical Industry Planning and Research Institute are forecasting even greater declines in steel demand to below 600m tpa by 2020 and to about 490m tpa by 2030.

In stark contrast, some iron ore producers have predicted that steel production in China will in fact increase and peak at about 950m tpa in the mid 2020s.

Cement outlook
Compared to steel, the outlook for global cement production is more positive. Even though growth slowed and overcapacity increased between 2010 and 2016 (see Table 3), most large cement producers are forecasting a CAGR of 2-4% between 2017 and 2019. High growth areas include sub-Saharan Africa, India, Indonesia, the Philippines and parts of the US.

The major issue facing the Western cement and lime industry is decarbonisation. According to the European Cement Association, for the industry to reach the European Commission’s target of 80% carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction in cement production by 2050, «breakthrough technology» will be required.

The refractories industry is estimated to currently consume about 40 million tonnes pa of industrial minerals and has more than doubled in size in the decade between 2000 and 2010 mainly due to the rapid industrialisation in China.

Refractories production and trade
Sales revenues of some of the major global refractory companies, together with the refractory divisions of other broader manufacturing business, have been stagnant or declining in recent years (see Table 4).
In US dollar terms, overall revenue decline in 2016 was about 4.5%.

The 52 major Chinese refractory companies recorded a 3.7% decline in revenue in 2016 (see Table 5). Profit margins improved slightly, but were still only around 3% on average. Total Chinese refractory production dropped almost 9% to 23.9m tonnes last year and apparent domestic consumption shrank by a similar amount to 21.9m tonnes in 2016.

Refractory brick production and consumption both fell by about 13%, which was more than double the decline of 5-6% in monolithic refractory production and consumption. The decline was recorded across almost every province (see Figure 3).

Both production and consumption of refractories in China in 2016 were down by about 27% from the peak in 2006.

Global refractory trade has grown at a CAGR of 1.7% between 2005 and 2016 (see Figure 4). However, refractory brick trade has been declining at a CAGR of about -0.9%, while monolithic trade has been growing relatively strongly at a CAGR 5.7%. Consequently, monolithic trade has risen from about one third of total trade in 2005 to about half in 2016.

The top 10 exporters of monolithics account for about 60% of total monolithic trade, with most growth in exports coming from Austria, UAE, China and Malaysia. Significant growth has mainly been in Oman, India, and the ASEAN countries of Singapore, Indonesia and Vietnam. (see Figures 5 and 6).

Refractory outlook
Refractory consumers are facing a range of issues, including but not limited to, weak market growth, decarbonisation, reduced application intensity, alternative fuels, competition from substitutes, pollution restrictions, overcapacity and low profitability.

The modest growth outlook for the major refractory markets in the next decade point to subdued expansion in demand for refractories. In this low growth environment, a further round of mergers
and takeovers is likely to occur in the refractory industry, including perhaps Chinese refractory companies expanding further into global markets.

The rapid growth in, and persistently high level of, global refractory production between 2000 and 2010 was to a large degree caused by inefficiencies in Chinese steel production, combined with readily available domestic supplies of refractory raw materials.

Specific refractory consumption of about 40kg/tonne of steel in 2000 has progressively declined to an estimated 15kg/tonne in 2016. Specific consumption in China is expected to decline even further to reach the rest of the world’s average standard of about 10kg/tonne in the next decade, due to improved steel production efficiencies together with the increasing use of recycled steel.

The combination of the above factors is expected to result in the global refractory market remaining at about 34-35m tpa for a number of years as the drop in production in China is balanced by steady growth in the rest of the world (see Figure7).

*Richard Flook is the Managing Principal at Mosman Resources. He has worked for both suppliers and consumers of minerals with global companies including, Steetley plc, Anglo American, Commercial Minerals (now Sibelco), Normandy Mining Ltd, Omya AG and Shinagawa Refractories. Richard is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy (FAusIMM (CP)), the Australian Institute of Company Directors (FAICD) and the Australian Institute of Energy (FAIE). He is a graduate of Sydney University (BSc First Class Honours, PhD) and the University of NSW (Master of Commerce). Since 2014, Richard’s has been the Managing Principal of Mosman Resources, a private consulting business, specialising in the production and marketing of industrial minerals and chemicals.

Refractories for Glass Production
P.Carlo Ratto*

Global annual glass production is estimated to be about 210m tonnes. Refractory demand for glass production is estimated to be around 500,000 tpa or about 2.4 Kg of refractory per tonne of glass.

Fused-cast refractories are a major category of refractory used in glass production (100,000 tpa). The second major group is basic refractory for regenerator packages which is almost the same or perhaps slightly more (about 120,000 tpa). Other refractory types are silica wedges for crown (about 80,000 tpa), generic silico-alumina, alumina, zircon and insulating firebrick (IFB) for all other applications (about 200,000 tpa in total).

SEPR Saint-Gobain is by far the major fused-cast refractory producer, with a total of seven plants worldwide. They represent about 55% of western, or about 43% of total world production. Alumina-zirconia-silica (AZS) fused cast refractories are still the major product group followed by aluminas and specialties. Globally speaking the major raw material is calcined alumina (about 63%) together with zircon sand (about 28%), synthetic zirconia (about 6%) and sodium carbonate (about 3%).

On a global basis flat glass production is slowly growing (about 2% pa), container glass production is flat and fibre glass is slowly growing. Low volume display glasses for computers and smartphones are growing at much higher rates but volumes are small and therefore related refractory usage is also small.

In general, glassmakers are facing similar issues to those for other refractory customers such as production overcapacity, energy consumption, pollution and decarbonisation.

Nov 20

Magnesia prices continue to rise in China

Turbulence continues in the Chinese magnesia markets with prices of dead burned magnesia following fused magnesia upwards.

Contacts in and outside of China have confirmed to IM that dead burned magnesia (DBM) prices have stated to rise in recent weeks following the trajectory first seen in fused magnesia (FM) due to supply constraints amid a government-led environmental crackdown on polluting industries.

However quotes in the market are even more disorderly now as the whole supply chain is facing disruption with the costs incurred to upgrade facilities to meet environmental standards more considerable for some material than others, market participants told IM.

Industrial Mineral’s DBM prices have jumped around $20/tonne so far in July.

DBM 92% MgO lump FOB China price increased to $190-210/tonne 11 July, while 97.5% MgO material rose to $345-375/tonne, 90% MgO moved to $180-200/tonne and 94-95% MgO jumped to $200-275/tonne.

The supply shortage has been more severe in FM than DBM, which explains why FM prices moved up first.
Spot prices for FM 96% MgO rose to $370-400/tonne 11 July, up $10 from a week earlier but $60-80 higher than early April.

FM basis 97% MgO (Ca:Si 1:1) rose to $465-490/tonne 11 July while 97% MgO (Ca:Si 2:1) material increased to $505-560/tonne and FM MgO 98% climbed to $760-920/tonne.

Caustic calcined magnesia (CCM) prices on the other hand remain stable with 94% MgO FOB China price, for example, holding at $170-190/tonne, 90-92% MgO at $135-160/tonne and 96 MgO at $265-285/tonne.

«CCM price remains stable because it’s the first and primary processed product, and its environmental upgrade only costs around Chinese renminbi (Rmb) 100,000 before reaching the environmental standard; while DBM and FM will cost Rmb 1m for environmental upgrade,» a major producer in Haicheng told IM.

«Magnesite shortage is also a problem, as the main producing area Haicheng is still banning the use of dynamite. Without this source material, production of CCM, DBM and especially FM is affected,» a producer in Dashiqiao said. «Luckily there are some small mines in Dashiqiao and they have some production for us to use, but it is not enough».

Nov 13

A rock and a hard place

Demand for refractory products is evolving, forcing suppliers to upgrade their offers and processes to stay ahead of the game, while Chinese-origin raw materials are appreciating on the back of supply shortages, making productions costlier, Davide Ghilotti, IM Chief Reporter, finds.

The refractory industry has come to find itself between a rock and a hard place, faced with challenges on the supply side as well as in end markets.

While total demand for refractory products continues to reduce in the face of readjusting steel output, production is also moving downwards. For their part, suppliers cannot afford to stand still but must innovate, revisit their current models, relentlessly pursuing new markets and securing new business.

At the same time, a number of raw materials markets have become increasingly short in supply: magnesia, alumina, bauxite and graphite are only a few among several commodities affected, with drastic effects on prices.
This is triggering a rise in sourcing costs, denting refractory producers’ margins at a time of weak end-market consumption.

Monolithic refractories are having an overall better ride amid these tough times, compared with bricks and basic shaped refractories, but the challenges for the industry are there for all to see.

For its size and share of the global refractory industry, China remains a barometer of the health of the sector.
China’s total production of refractory products – this includes both shaped and unshaped materials, as well as insulation and other products – stood at 23.91m tonnes in 2016, according to data from The Association of China Refractories Industry.

This marks a drop of about 9% against the previous year, when output was a higher 26.15m tonnes.

All segments suffered a decline year-on-year.

a-rock-and-a-hard-place

 

Dense shaped refractories, which is by far the single largest category produced in China, lost over 1.2m tonnes (-11%) worth of output in 2016, falling below 14m tonnes. Fireclay base bricks and high-alumina bricks shared a similar fate, decreasing by 11% and 13% respectively, to 2.84m and 2.03m tonnes. Si-based bricks output dropped 38% y-o-y to 1.17m tonnes.

China’s refractories industry exhibited substantial growth in the last couple of decades, moving from just below 10m tonnes in 2000 to 32m tonnes in 2006, but today’s numbers are far from that peak.

It was not that much better on the export front: 2016 exports of Chinese refractory products (excluding source materials) were 5% down y-o-y.

The picture between segments is slightly mixed. While alkali refractory exports rose 5% to 867,600 tonnes, Al-Si based refractory exports fell 9%, to 662,400 tonnes. Shipments of other materials, at 110,700 tonnes, were down 32% y-o-y.

Back in March, IM reported that 2016 export value of both refractory products and source materials had reached its lowest level for the past five years at $2.57bn, down 12% on 2015 and 23% lower than 2014.

Demand for refractory products as a whole has been dwindling in recent years, mainly on the back of decreasing steel production. Steelmaking is the single largest end market for refractories, accounting for over 60% of end market demand.

Steel capacity in the western world has fallen, with facilities shut all over Europe and North America. At the same time China, which alone supplies over half of global output, has been forced to reduce output, and plans to gradually shut excessive capacity to bring the market back from oversupply.

This crucially meant that, while refractory demand in Europe fell due to local plants closing, Chinese demand also restructured, and was not in a position to pick up the slack created in the West.

India is arguably the sole destination where steel capacity is still increasing, and one of the few markets where new operations are being set up.

This has created fierce competition among refractory suppliers trying to elbow their way into the country. China has a prominent position on the Indian market, not only due to its logistical proximity. Some western suppliers are trying to ‘go local’ by teaming up with domestic companies or setting up operations in the country to try to bridge the geographical and cultural gap and gain real access to the market.

Monolithics on the up
Amid falling demand in main end markets, the buying patterns of refractory consumers are evolving.
With the widespread slowdown in steel output and weak pricing conditions, end users have seen profit margins shrinking. This has created an impending need for containing costs while maximising performances.

This shift is behind falling demand for basic refractory bricks, as more facilities move to monolithics.

While refractory usage globally remains dominated by bricks, a process of substitution is nevertheless taking place, with shaped products on the down and castables growing.

Currently, monolithics account for just over one-third (31%) of the total market in volume terms, with the remaining 69% share taken up by bricks, according to Calderys data released at the IM Bauxite & Alumina conference in Miami in March.

Even within bricks consumers, the vast majority (72%) of material consists of basic, magnesia and dolomite-based, brick products, while 28% is in acidic bricks. Conversely, the pattern of usage is essentially the opposite for monolithics, where 68% is in acidic mixes, and 32% in basic mixes.

According to Calderys, substitution between bricks and monolithics is «almost complete» in mature/developed countries – where castable usage is put at 40-50% of the total.

In developing countries, meanwhile, monolithics have not reached the same level of penetration, due to a number of factors that support bricks. These include low cost of labour, large availability of brick supply, and a lack of skills and expertise in monolithics. This underlines a long-term continuation of brick material usage in these markets, which will persist in the foreseeable future.

Raw materials: getting shorter
If demand from end consumers has dampened profitability as of late (due to a number of reasons which IM contributor, Richard Flook, explains in detail on pp 36-44), refractory producers have been struggling also with raw materials sourcing this year.

China, a leading producer of refractory minerals, has seen several of its key mineral production supply chains severely curtailed by environmental inspections by local authorities, amid an ongoing plan to curb the high level of air pollution in the country’s most industrialised areas.

This is actually a continuation of a policy that Beijing started in the first half of 2016. At that time, the clampdown on polluting industrial operations had mainly affected bauxite mining and brown fused alumina production (more on this later).

Since Q1 this year, environmental controls have intensified and spread to virtually all mineral production operations that are deemed polluting, as well as secondary processing and downstream sectors.

The immediate effect of the controls has been the shutdown of hundreds of operations in various provinces of China. In some cases the closures were temporary, while companies updated where possible their facilities to bring them in line with regulations. In many cases, however, small-size, obsolete operations were closed for good. Depending on the commodity, this took a sizeable share of production off the market.

At the time of publication, local sources told IM environmental teams are heading back to areas they had already inspected for a second round of checks. With elections in the ruling Communist Party due later this year, Beijing is keen to continue its clean-up action. It is early to assess the real impact this will have on future mineral production and supply, but several markets have been affected already, with lower output, falling inventories and rising prices.

Bauxite and alumina
Bauxite was among the first materials to be hit by the restrictions imposed by the Chinese government on pollution thresholds and operating processes of companies.

It first started in Q2 2016 with the intention to clamp down on illegal bauxite mining, which then added to Beijing’s strive to put a stronger effort towards environmental preservation. Facilities still relying on coal as an energy source were forced to switch to natural gas, or be closed. Shanxi and Guizhou were among the main areas affected. By the end of the year, many bauxite production operations had been shut for good.

Alumina, especially brown fused (BFA), suffered a similar fate. Stricter anti-pollution checks in main producing provinces of Shanxi and Henan hit production and started lifting spot prices already in August last year, as IM reported at the time.

Disruption to mining and production operations caused supply shortages and supported high prices for both bauxite and BFA well into the second half of this year. Securing volumes has become extremely problematic for some grades, such as high-purity bauxite 86%, 87% or 88%.

The bauxite shortage triggered a run for alternative materials. Andalusite suppliers told IM that demand from bauxite consumers has surged this year to date. Unfortunately, this material is also short. Andalusite production in both main origins – South Africa and Peru – was slashed in Q1 by heavy rain and flooding hitting mining areas. Many suggest 2017 supply will be insufficient to cover existing contracts, let alone meet demand from consumers who cannot find any bauxite.

Magnesia
The global magnesia market received a first shake in December, when China unexpectedly announced the scrapping of its existing duty regime and quota system for exports of magnesia products.

With hindsight, a first sign of the country’s intentions could be seen from late October. When the government announced the 2017 export quotas for all agricultural and industrial commodities, magnesia did not make the list.
Authorities went quiet for a few weeks until they finally announced that magnesia exports from 1 January would not be subject to duties nor quotas.

According to the preceding regime, export tariffs were set at 5% for caustic calcined magnesia (CCM) and 10% for both deadburned magnesia (DBM) and fused magnesia (FM).

The industry’s immediate reaction was one of widespread concern. Most market participants feared that a no-duty regime would lead to Chinese sellers flooding the international market with low-priced product, aiming to secure whatever demand was left after a long period of weakness in refractory end markets.

Confirming the industry’s fears to an extent, in the first few months of this year Chinese FOB prices for all magnesia products – CCM, DBM and FM – declined.

The downtrend was short-lived, however. As Chinese authorities tightened the controls over industrial pollution, many magnesia operations were affected and had to shut. Unable to produce, producers resorted to selling from stockpiles, which rapidly decreased. As short supply became evident, prices moved upwards again.

By early May, virtually all magnesia production facilities had stopped and fused magnesia had become unavailable in Liaoning province. Prices of all three products surged during the summer months, exceeding pre-quota scrapping levels.

It did not take long before the magnesia shortage came to affect refractories end markets. In June, the Refractory Industry Association of Yingkou, in Liaoning, recommended its member companies to raise sale prices of magnesium-based refractory products, to compensate for the rising raw material costs.

Graphite
As it did with magnesia, Beijing also scrapped duties on natural graphite exports, which were subject to a 20% tax until last year. New offers for flake and amorphous graphite decreased further as a result, despite several years of weakness due to oversupply and low demand. It seemed that another downtrend awaited.

However, the restrictions to mining eventually came to affect graphite production as well. Environmental inspection teams first reached Heilongjiang province, then Shandong. Operations closed, and those that remained in business have found it increasingly difficult to source quality ore.

Constraints to supply are starting to be felt, not least because the limitations on chemical processing have restricted acid-based graphite purification processes. Output of plus mesh graphite sizes has been particularly squeezed.

So prices, which had fallen in Q1, picked up again in Q2 and, by August, posted further upticks. Graphite remains in an overall better supply situation compared with bauxite or magnesia, but sellers see further disruptions to availability and aim to up their prices as a result.

All in, refractory suppliers are waging battle on various fronts. Contingencies on the raw materials side mean sourcing and production costs will remain higher for the foreseeable future, while evolution in end markets will affect demand for what products customers will want and how much of them they will buy. Refractory suppliers need to brace themselves as they see through a continuously-evolving scenario on both ends, in the hope that the industry will eventually settle and find a new normal.

Nov 06

MagMin 2017: Magnesia supply shortage won’t last long, China says

MagMin conference delegates heard from the Chinese government that the severe supply squeeze that has hit the sector will not last long but no timescale can be given.

The magnesia supply shortage in China is not expected to remain for long but is unclear when production will normalise, Chinese government official told delegates during the MagMin 2017 in Dalian, China on 11 July.

MagMin was held in China for the first time. Global market participants gathered in the northern Chinese trade, port and industrial city of Dalian to discuss the harsh reality of the supply shortage in Liaoning Province, the main magnesia producing area, and to hear the view from the government. Other topics included the latest environmental techniques for the industry as well as professional presentations from downstream steel and refractory sectors.

The major area of interest for delegates was the government’s view on the supply squeeze. In Q2, China’s magnesia industry was hit by a severe supply shortage following environmental checks and dynamite restrictions, which led to all production being stopped without notice. It was considered a harsh move by upstream producers and downstream buyers alike and has left a lot of uncertainty in the market.

«The source material shortage will not continue for long,» Guangqi Han, Deputy Director of People’s Government of Liaoning Province, Special Industrial Resource Protection Office, told delegates.

He explained that the environmental inspections were not intended to restrict material but were about future development of the sector.

China has passed the stage of fast economic development at the expanse of environment, and the government is now looking at ways to develop the industry economically as well as environmentally, he said.

The government is yet to make a clear and unified standard on a national level, but it is working on it. No timeline has been confirmed.

«It won’t take long because even domestic steel companies won’t allow this to happen – they need to produce normally,» one Chinese delegate told IM. «A decision might be easy to make – so too a plan – but its execution is difficult. There are so many magnesia companies – if the government has a plan to control the total output, it won’t be easy to realise. [It is] not like the rare earths industry which has been consolidated into six major companies after years of painful regroupings as well as M&As guided by both central and numerous local governments, and needless to say the constant conflicts among different players,» one official from Liaoning Provincial Association of Nonmetallic Mineral Industry said.

Uncertainty persists, no end in-sight
The government’s message to delegates was that the supply shortage will not last long, but they do not know when it will end.

«What the government said is useless and completely bureaucratic; it doesn’t solve any problem or promise anything,» one Chinese producer said. «Even if they promise something, it feels empty and helpless because they don’t have a unified standard yet.»

«[When] the governments of Liaoning Province, Haicheng City and Dashiqiao City all showed up at this seminar; it means something – something serious,» another delegate said.

«Obviously the whole industry has no clue about what happened or what will happen, but at least the government is here to show they are paying attention. If they get many opinions from market players, even if they are just complaints, the government will know and do something. So this is a great chance for us to meet and talk with government officials, especially the provincial officials who sat at the seminar from the beginning to the end,» he added.

Entradas más antiguas «

» Entradas más recientes

Translate »